Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
Latest Post:
Started By:
27 days ago.
by Kozy62

We need a Change...

Considering "Hope and Change have failed, we need to find our next President from those running against Mr Obama. Even liberal commentators, such as Maureen Dowd are turning against the President as they recognize his lack of ability...


Member Comments

A vote for Hillary is really a vote for George Soros...

A leaked document from George Soros’s Open Society Foundations exposes the billionaire’s level of involvement in attempting to build what his organization describes as a “national movement” to reform local police forces across the U.S. The reform largely consists of federal guidelines for local police forces.

The document identifies an opportunity in the police killings of African-American men in Ferguson, Staten Island, North Charleston, and Baltimore. It relates that the U.S. contingent of Open Society held a planning meeting titled, “Police Reform: How to Take Advantage of the Crisis of the Moment and Drive Long-Term Institutional Change in Police-Community Practice.”

The extensive memo further documents that Soros-financed groups and personalities influenced President Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing, which last May released a final report consisting of 60 points providing direction to localities.

Posted 27 days ago.

This administration is completely out of control...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times - Tuesday, August 30, 2016

The IRS has discovered more than 1 million Americans whose Social Security numbers were stolen by illegal immigrants, but officials never bothered to tell the taxpayers themselves, the agency’s inspector general said in a withering new report released Tuesday.

Investigators first alerted the IRS to the problem five years ago, but it’s still not fixed, the inspector general said, and a pilot program meant to test a solution was canceled — and fell woefully short anyway.

As a result, most taxpayers don’t learn that their identities have been stolen and their Social Security files may be screwed up.

“Taxpayers identified as victims of employment-related identity theft are not notified,” the inspector general said.

We "must" change!

Posted 27 days ago.

Just another of many examples of not telling the truth?

"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" was President Barack Obama's signature catchphrase he used to sell the Affordable Care Act to the American people. Now Obamacare's flagship website,, no longer even addresses the issue.

Ironically, the section in question was the first public (if indirect) admission by the Obama administration that the president's promise was less than a "guarantee."

Posted 34 days ago.

I tire of the politics and the pain many share and yet the obvious is defining.

Baltimore is a Democratic city, Milwaukee is a Democratic city, Chicago, Detroit, and on and on.

This is a most inconvenient truth. This is what binds them.

For decade after decade, Democrats have controlled policy and politics in the broken cities. This is the proof of Democratic success? Really?

The broken schools have been run by Democrats for decades. The broken institutions are run by Democrats.

The political corruption in these cities is Democratic corruption, where government is the hammer used to beat others into forking over their cash.

Guess the truth hurts...just saying

Now to be honest, I don't remember when or if I have ever voted for anyone based upon whether they have an "R" or a "D" beside their name on the ballot but some do and if so, are they even willing to check the facts before they vote? I wonder what would change if the "Rs" and the "Ds&quo

Posted 38 days ago.

A majority of Americans disapprove of the FBI's recommendation not to charge Hillary Clinton with a crime over her handling of email while secretary of state, and a similar number in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll say the issue leaves them worried about how she would handle her responsibilities as president if elected.

Most also say the email controversy won't (but should) affect their vote in the presidential election. But 28 percent say it leaves them less likely to support her.

Reactions to the decision are highly political, with partisanship factoring heavily in people's views. Yet Democrats don't back Clinton up on the issue nearly as much as Republicans criticize her, and independents side more with Republicans.

Posted 78 days ago.

6/30/16: Clinton appears to have emerged relatively unscathed from the release this week of the House Select Committee on Benghazi’s report on her actions as secretary of State in connection with the murder of the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans by Islamic terrorists in September 2012. Why?

Rasmussen Reports will be releasing new numbers on Clinton and Benghazi at 10:30 a.m. Eastern today.

Trump made a major speech on jobs & trade on Tuesday that even the NY Times characterized as “perhaps the most forceful case he has made for the crux of his candidacy …. that the days of globalism have passed and that a new approach is necessary.” Some also speculate that last week’s vote in Great Britain to leave the European Union signals a rise of economic nationalism that is good for Trump. Despite the media panic and market swings that have resulted, Americans are not particularly worried that the “Brexit” will hurt them in the pocketbook.

Posted 89 days ago.

Thursday, June 30, 2016

The tables have turned in this week’s White House Watch. After trailing Hillary Clinton by five points for the prior two weeks, Donald Trump has now taken a four-point lead.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey of Likely U.S. Voters finds Trump with 43% of the vote, while Clinton earns 39%. Twelve percent (12%) still like another candidate, and five percent (5%) are undecided.

Last week at this time, it was Clinton 44%, Trump 39%. This is Trump’s highest level of support in Rasmussen Reports’ matchups with Clinton since last October. His support has been hovering around the 40% mark since April, but it remains to be seen whether he’s just having a good week or this actually represents a real move forward among voters.

Posted 89 days ago.

June 2, 2016 11:05 am

The political arm of United Mine Workers of America, a union of coal miners, has endorsed Sen. Rob Portman (R., Ohio) for reelection, dealing a blow to Democratic challenger Ted Strickland.

The move represents a departure for the union, which has a history of endorsing Strickland, a former governor, and fellow Democrats. Strickland has come under fire in recent months for his ties to anti-coal organizations. Portman’s campaign announced the endorsement from the union’s National Council of Coal Miners Political Action Committee (COMPAC) in a statement Thursday.

“We very much appreciate the support you have given both active and retired coal miners and their families, especially in such difficult times as the coal industry is experiencing today,” COMPAC International President Cecil Roberts and International Secretary-Treasurer Daniel Kane wrote in a letter to Portman.

The leaders said that COMPAC will “be actively working to elect you."

Posted 117 days ago.

Former Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein, who helped break open the Watergate scandal in the 1970s, told CNN: Hillary Clinton did not want her e-mails subjected to the Freedom of Information Act or subpoenas from Congress, and that’s why she set up a home-brew server. I think we all know that. People around her will tell you that in private if you really get them behind a closed door. I spoke to a number of top Democratic officials, and they’re terrified, including people at the White House, that her campaign is in freefall because of this distrust factor. And, indeed, Trump has a similar problem. But she’s the one whose numbers are going south.

Please...we need a change!

Posted 119 days ago.

I wonder at what point do good law abiding voters realize Hillary Clinton should never be President?

Posted 124 days ago.

The race begins...

Posted 147 days ago.

When asked about releasing the transcripts of the speeches that Wall Street companies paid her big fat checks to come deliver privately, Hillary Clinton used every one of Patches O’Houlihans’s five d’s of dodgeball: dodge, duck, dip, dive and dodge!

When this first started coming up we thought, eh. When Bernie Sanders kept pressing it, we thought, eh. But this is the hardest we’ve ever seen Hillary Clinton work on anything. She really wants to keep those transcripts out of our hands. Which means we really, really want to see them.

Plus, sowing discontent among democrats is just good clean fun. Come on, release them, Hillary!!

Posted 165 days ago.

Want a reason to make a serious change...

h t t p://videos2view.n e t/tax-fraud.h t m

Posted 192 days ago.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest was asked Wednesday why the Obama administration opposed Republican senators applying the “Biden rule” to the most recent Supreme Court nomination.

“They say that’s the same case,” host Bret Baier said after playing a 1992 clip of then-Sen. Joe Biden arguing against nominating a justice during an election year.

The press secretary argued that Biden “also indicated” in the speech that if the president put forth a “consensus pick”, one that the democrats would completely agree with, he would “give that person a fair hearing in an up or down vote.”

“That’s precisely what President Obama has done this time,” Earnest said.

How could you fall for that?

Posted 192 days ago.

This search for a conspiracy will take Mrs. Clinton down the road to perdition — to the end of her hopes. Along that road are instructions to a subordinate to divert all her government emails through her private server. On the side of that road are emails instructing her aides to remove "secret" markings from documents & resend the documents to her via a non-secure fax machine.

On that road are emails revealing the names of secret undercover intelligence assets, the locations of North Korean nuclear facilities, the transcripts of telephone conversations among foreign intelligence agents, & the travel plans of then-U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens in the days before he was murdered.

Democrats who indulge in Clinton's false hopes will do so at their peril. Don't they want to know of her potential status as a criminal defendant before they complete their nominating process? Or do they, like her, think that they can just hope that all this will go away?

Posted 207 days ago.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared sharply and perhaps evenly divided in its first major abortion case in almost a decade, one that has the potential to revise constitutional standards and to affect millions of women.

Several justices seemed frustrated by gaps in the factual record presented to them. The three more conservative justices said there was little evidence that clinics have closed or would close because of the law.

Justice Antonin Scalia’s death last month may have muted the prospect of truly bold action, but even a 4-to-4 tie would have enormous consequences because it would leave in place an appeals court decision that could drive down the number of abortion clinics in Texas to about 10, from roughly 40.

Posted 209 days ago.

Aren't you ready for a change?

Gratuitous. Nasty. Petty. Spiteful. Insulting. Just plain rude. When the rhetoric of a major party’s leading presidential candidate falls to this level, we should be scornful.

So, how is it OK when it isn’t just a presidential candidate, but a president, who does it?

Donald Trump’s policy of demeaning and snarking his political opponents has been a favorite habit of President Obama for the last eight years. Obama is perhaps the first president who believes that leading the country and playing to the beliefs of the extremists in his own party amount to the same thing, and like Trump fans, Obama fans are motivated in large degree by sheer hatred.

They love to hear their idol channel their rage by bashing people they don’t like.

Posted 218 days ago. do you feel about this?

Ratings plummeted into the toilet for TLC’s show, All-American Muslims. The show, supported by the terrorism-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) & other pro-Islam organizations, was used to portray active Muslim families, who are strict followers of their faith, as a peaceful community. Yet, Americans don’t want to watch such nonsense.

With such low ratings, Lowe’s decided to DROP them as a sponsor!

Lowe’s is being attacked by the left for dropping the show, including newly elected Congressman Ted Lieu (D-CA), who called Lowe’s “bigoted, shameful, & un-American.” Apparently, in his mind, Lowe’s doesn’t have the right to decide where their ad dollars should end up, even if the show’s ratings were horrible. CAIR is furious about the decision, & called for a national boycott of the hardware giant.

Christian organizations, such as the Family Florida Association, have now offered Lowe’s their support...You?

Posted 221 days ago.

If President Obama wanted a collegial relationship with the Republican Senate, he should have thought of that long ago, and if didn’t want to lose the Senate, he should have moderated his stances. What he did was cause hate and division. Now, he will pronounce himself shocked and saddened that Congress doesn’t want to hold his coat while he tries to remake the high court. The Senate should hold firm, and let Elizabeth Warren and her colleagues rend their garments and gnash their teeth.

Posted 224 days ago.

Rather than simply focusing on Mrs. Clinton’s actions as secretary of state, the FBI investigation may be proceeding along two tracks: his & hers. So far, two areas of focus have been mentioned.

One is the possible abuse of highly sensitive information by Mrs. Clinton through her use of a private, unsecured server. The other involves possible violations of public corruption law: whether she & Mr. Clinton used her position as secretary of state to further the interests of the Clinton Foundation. When these two apparently separate tracks are looked at conjointly, two major questions arise concerning Mr. Clinton.

First, did Mr. Clinton, in fact, own, pay for & house on his property the server used by Hillary while she was secretary of state? And second, did Bill touch, read, see and/or use any of the classified documents that appeared on that server, & if so, did he have the appropriate clearances and approval?

Posted 236 days ago.

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
Remember my email address.