Don’t rush on health care bill
We wish Congress deserved the type of praise health care professionals do because of their dedication to fighting disease. Unfortunately, it does not.
Last Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi unveiled a new national health care proposal. She then began pushing for the House to vote on it this week.
We will make a prediction, with full confidence that we are correct: If the House votes on the bill next week, not one representative will understand the measure fully. It is 1,990 pages long. We doubt that even Pelosi, D-Calif., could go far beyond the talking points about it prepared by her staff.
Most journalists will not read the entire bill, either. They simply do not have time. As a result, only a tiny minority - fewer than 1 percent, in our estimation - of Americans will know what it is that liberals in the House intend to foist upon us.
That is not an accident or a necessity. It is a plan by Pelosi and other liberal lawmakers, who don't want the public to have time to discuss the bill. They are aware that during the past several months, serious flaws have been uncovered in previous health care proposals - after the public has had opportunities to analyze and discuss them.
That will not happen this time, if Pelosi, President Barack Obama and other liberal, big-government advocates in Washington have their way.
We urge representatives from our states to insist that time be given for discussion and debate about the bill - at least for Americans to understand it. Doing otherwise is not government of the people, by the people, for the people.
|
WatchDog
|
|
|---|---|
|
11-09-09 8:23 PM
|
That OBVIOUS personal ageneda war you got going on with our editorial guru is interesting. But I think it's a battle you lost a long long time ago! Hail Salem News!! What a bunch of cry baby liberals. You clowns just got your wish. You passed a "a jobs-killing, tax-hiking, deficit-exploding" bill. The best part about it is idiots like the two are not exempt and are going to be paying for it out your hineys! Yehawwwwwww! Mandatory health insurance for all compliments of rmcgtr and block50. Both sitting there with their checkbooks and pens in hand!!!
|
|
block50
|
|
|
11-07-09 9:56 AM
|
Also, why have your 'post a comment' links been removed from your news stories. All of the papers I read online, including your sister publication the Morning Journal, and others like the Alliance Review, the Vindicator, and all the national papers like the NY Times, not only provide for, but encourage commentary from their readers. Are you becoming that thin skinned? Do you reject opinions that don't follow your dogma? I hope this is an oversight. If it isn't, I hope you enjoy your continuing slide into oblivion. By disengaging your readership, you only hasten that soon to come day that you become totally irrelevant.
|
|
block50
|
|
|
11-07-09 9:43 AM
|
This looks like a news release straight from Fox 'News'. Drivel indeed. It's not like this discussion began yesterday and my insurance rates are going up 25% in January. What have our dear conservative friends proposed about this? NOTHING! Get off it Salem News, your argument is tired and lame and quite frankly just a bit disingenuous.
|
|
rmcgtr
|
|
|
11-06-09 1:36 AM
|
who writes this drivel? as an editorial , it should be read by fox "news". a plan by liberals? no one has time to read it? where have they been? it's the res job to stay up on whats going on. i suspect thios writer has fallen into the republica trapp of "just say no" and following boehner on "talking about it this summer" WTF!!!!
|




